Share This Post

Grand Jury / Law

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH.

TO:
HMRC
DMB 422
BX5 5AB

 

FROM:

Enter details here

 

 

DATE OF NOTICE’S BEING SERVED: ***************

 

Sent by recorded post.

 

NOTICE.

 

Contents:

       AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH.

____________

(evidence of non jurisdiction of the Queen)

_____________

 

 NOTICE OF MISPRISION OF TREASON.

                            (David Cameron-Treason evidence)       

                                          _____________

 

NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

_____________

 

NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST HARASSMENT.

  (including new fee schedule).

_____________

 

          NOTICE OF FEE SCHEDULE.

_____________

 

    CLAIM OF RIGHT.

       Maxim in law: – “ No one is restrained from having several defences.” 

TAKE NOTICE: This document is EVIDENCE and a copy of which is required to be filed into the Judge/Magistrates records in any administrative hearing in connection with this matter. Any person or human being who enters a plea in Enter Name Here                             absence SHALL BE the defendant(s) for any and all costs, penalties, charges and suchlike.

These SIX (6) LAWFUL NOTICES herein are required to be addressed and replied to in ‘substance‘ within 28 days of their receipt, failing to do so may create lawful estoppel by acquiescence or by substance (which means, you need to respond to ALL of the numbered points that are required within this compilation of Lawful Notices IN FULL) and, by paying close attention to those points that require a full response and, by addressing each separate and serious concern independently of all others).

 

DEFINITION OF NOTICE – (Black Law Dictionary 5th Edition)

Information; the result of observation, whether by the senses or the mind; Knowledge of the existence of a fact or state of affairs; the means of knowledge. Intelligence by whatever means communicated.

Any fact which would put an ordinary prudent person on inquiry. That which imparts information to one to be notified.

A person has notice of a fact if he knows the fact, has reason to know it, or has been given notification of it.

 

WHY A  COMPILATION OF 6 NOTICES ? It is my honourable and truthful intention to document and evidence some of the variances of this Treason matter which are evidenced and presented herein, to enable a broader sphere of understanding that encompasses a wider array of evidenced facts, most of which allude to the crime ofTreason at common law.

It is also my intention to seek remedy by evidencing the fact that I am completely Innocent of any wrongdoing in this matter and, that I have done all that I could in order to abstain from colluding with those evil traitors in government, etc., it being my constitutional DUTY NOT TO COMPLY with a TREASONOUS REGIME and anUNLAWFUL ADMINISTRATION of injustice” and, that I claim under a common law jurisdiction ‘lawful excuse’ to any alleged criminality which  can be more easily evidenced within this compilation of facts. My intent in forwarding this evidence to you is for my defence and not as an offensive act.

Furthermore, I have compiled this entire document under ‘duress of circumstances’ whilst being a freeman on the land ‘officially’ in lawful rebellion, all of which is evidenced herein. Therefore I have acted ONLY as a ‘loyal subject’in accordance with British constitutional law which can easily be proven in a common law jurisdiction with 12 impartial peers overseeing and presiding on the facts. Any man woman or person that stands against me in this matter shall be accused of being a quisling and colluding with the enemy and is therefore a traitor to their country.

In serving such notices however, it also raises the eyebrows of the traitors among us and has the propensity to weed-out the bad apples by observation of their Actions. Once Treason is known there is no simple escape, as those that know you know may retain the evidence to prove it.

Any hearings administered with regard to the unlawful charges/allegations brought against my legal person/ human being, either occurring by my own free will or by force,

I, Enter Name Here will automatically be assumed to be the sole administrator of my estate as a third party agent for the legal person; (Enter Name Here) and, as the claimant and authorized beneficiary and executor of the account and, on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjur

 

TO:
HMRC
DMB 422
BX5 5AB

 

 

From:

*************

 

 

DATE OF NOTICE BEING SERVED: ************

 

sent by recorded post.

 

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

—————————–

 

Dear, HMRC,

This is  1.) an affidavit of truth, 2.) a notice of understanding of misprision of treason, 3.) a notice of conditional acceptance, 4.) a notice to cease and desist harassment, 5.) a notice of breach of fee schedule and 6.) a claim of right and should be handled as such in the proper manner in the protection of that.

I (Enter Name Here), am a man acting under duress of circumstances at this

time as an authorised third party representative, beneficiary and chief executor for the ‘legal person’ do solemnly swear, declare and depose that the entire compilation of documents, statements and evidence herein are both truthful and factual to my lawful understanding and to the best of my present day knowledge and first-hand experience. I do swear by Almighty God and on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury;

  • THAT I am competent to state the matters set forth herein.
  • THAT I have first-hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.
  • That all the facts stated herein are true, correct, and certain, admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a witness, I will testify to their veracity.
  • THAT the eternal, unchanged principles of commercial law are:

a.)  A workman is worthy of his hire.

b.)  All are equal under the law.

  • In law truth is sovereign.

d.)Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.

e.)  An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in law.

f.)  An un-rebutted affidavit becomes the judgement in law.

g.)  All matters must be expressed to be resolved.

h.) He who leaves the battlefield first loses by default.

I.) Sacrifice is the measure of credibility.

j.) A lien or claim can be satisfied only through an affidavit by a point to point rebuttal resolution by jury or payment.

5.) THAT commercial processes (including this affidavit and the required responses with it)  ARE NON-JUDICIAL and pre-judicial because:

a.) No judge, court, government or any agencies thereof, or any other whatsoever can abrogate anyone’s Affidavit of truth;

b.) Only a party affected by an affidavit can speak and act for himself and is solely responsible for responding with his own Affidavit of truth, that no-one else can do for him.                                                                                                                                            .
c.) THAT the lawful seizure, collection, and transfer of ownership of money or property must be effected by means of a valid commercial lien.                                                                     .
d.) THAT I am not the creation or chattel property of any person or any government agency whatsoever. I am not under any government agency, state or federal (i.e. unions), or any other self passed laws, statutes, regulations or policies.

6.) THAT any and all of the various papers, documents, adhesion contracts or “agreements”  . I may have signed with any government agency or entity or any others that might be construed to indicate a conclusion contrary to my herein below assertions were made,        . signed by me on the basis of a mistake due to lack of full disclosure creating a deliberate lack of full knowledge, a deliberate action of fraud, (2006 fraud Act section 3) non- disclosure concealment of material fact, and misrepresentation. Such action thereby creates a stressful situation of duress and intimidation (tort), vitiating all documents by such action of fraud.

  • THAT it is the sincere belief and spiritual conviction of this affiant that slavery and peonage are immoral, are violations of the first precept of commercial law (“a workman is worthy of his hire”), that fraud, misrepresentation, non-disclosure, intimidation, deceit, concealment of material fact, lying, and treachery are morally wrong.
  • THAT I have absolutely no desire to be a “client” (slave) of any government agency, state or federal (i.e. unions), or any of their principles, or the “United Kingdom,” or to incur any debts or obligations to said entities for whatever “benefits” said entities might purpose/presume to provide or seek to provide to this affiant, or be directed by, subject to, or accountable to any parties other than my own conscience and best judgement for purpose of preserving inviolate my unalienable/inalienable indefeasible rights to life, liberty, freedom and property while engaging in the honourable, productive, and non-harmful activities of my life.
  • THAT I Paul am the sole and absolute owner of myself, my body and to my understanding the chief executor and beneficiary of my estate and, I possess unconditional allodial sovereign title thereto and that I abjure, Renounce, forsake and disavow utterly and absolutely now and forever all presumptions of power, authority, or right by any government agency, and its principles, over the rights, life, liberty, freedom or property over this affiant from whatever source presumed or derived.

10.)  THAT I Enter Name Here have a clear conscience of any perceive wrongdoing (no ‘Mens rea,’) with regard to the law societies claims and assertions/allegations or charges brought against myself/legal person under statutes derived from the law societies legislation, that which relate to shipping rights under Maritime Admiralty law, which to my understanding requires a two party consenting contract with equal consideration and full disclosure, before becoming a legally/lawfully binding contract standing under such legislation, which cannot be ‘legally’ enforced in any administrative hearing except under the common law, where there is proven to be a ‘Corpus Delecti’ (body of crime), where it can be properly/lawfully adjudicated on.

I DO NOT and NEVER HAVE wilfully consented to contract with nor stand under the legislation of the law society (Maritime Admiralty law) under any circumstances whatsoever, particularly whilst I am duty bound under the terms and conditions demanded by the ‘Great Charter’, and invoked by the barons’ committee in 2001 under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 – LAWFUL REBELLION, which to my lawful understanding stands to this day by un-rebutted notices to Buckingham palace

 

LAWFUL REBELLION FACTS. (Affidavit of truth).

—————————————————

  • Magna Carta: Chapter 61 of Magna Carta covers the subject’s rights to appeal to a . committee of barons for redress against a tyrant.
  • In 1999, after several hundred thousand postcards were sent to Queen Elizabeth 11 urging her not to give royal assent to the treaty of Nice, a quorum of 65 peers acting under the Magna Carta chapter 61, selected 25 of their number to form such a committee. They were satisfied that the conditions required to justify the use of the procedure specified in chapter 61 of  Magna Carta were established.
  • Four of these peers served the petition on Queen Elizabeth 11 on the 7thFebruary 2001 at noon, insisting that she should; “Withhold the royal assent from any parliamentary Bill which attempts to ratify the Treaty of Nice, unless and until the people of the United Kingdom have given their clear and specific approval; uphold and preserve the rights, freedoms and customs of your loyal subjects as set out in Magna Carta and the Declaration Of Rights, which you, our sovereign, swore before the nation to uphold and preserve in your Coronation Oath of June 1953.

 

(The service of the barons’ petition was reported in the Daily Telegraph on the 24th of March 2001.)

 

4,) These things she has conspicuously failed to do.

5.) As a consequence of her failure to comply, all loyal subjects are required, “ Together with the community of the whole realm, to distress us and distrain us (the crown) in all possible ways, namely by seizing our castles. Lands, possessions and In any other way they can. Until redress has been obtained as they see fit.”

6.) The fact that “The whole community of the realm” is obliged to support the Barons’ committee, means that individual OFFICIALS HAVE NO AUTHORITY to issue demands in the name of the crown, and commit the statutory offence of  “fraud by misrepresentation”, if they try.

7.) The courts have no authority to deny the subjects’ rights. Representatives of the crown may not breach the common law maxim that, “No man may sit in judgement of his own cause.” it is for the Barons’ committee to let us know when they are satisfied that redress has been obtained.

8.) The Barons’ Committee procedure is based on the subjects’ common law right of “duress of circumstances”– we may commit minor crimes in order to prevent a worse one happening.

9.) Transferring allegiance is not Treason because the oaths of allegiance are the office, not the holder.

10.) Accordingly, as a loyal subject of the realm, I have entered into lawful rebellion as demanded and required by chapter 61 of Magna Carta 1215. When redress (as determined by the Barons’ Committee), has been achieved, I will once again be a true and loyal subject to the holder of the office.

 

TAKE NOTICE THAT;

The “flash stick” which evidence the crimes of Sedition and Treason at common law, have been included within the contents of this document for your IMMEDIATE and URGENT ATTENTION (Exhibit A).

 

 

 

ARREST. DETAINMENT CHARGES AND BAIL (Affidavit of truth).

&  SUMMARY OF NOTICES SERVED.

 

Enter Name

 

                                 -ARREST & proceedings (Affidavit of truth).

 

                                                            Enter Name

 

 

LAWFUL CLAIMS & ALLEGATIONS (Affidavit of truth).

                            —————————————————————-

The claims/allegations within this affidavit are the truth as I know it to be and, I make them on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and, with all my natural unalienable common law rights intact;

 

I      Enter Name claim that TREASON HAS, & IS TO THIS DAY, STILL BEING COMMITTED by those evidenced herein.

                                    

 

                                                            Enter Name here

 

Signed:                                                        Witnessed by

 

Date:                                                           Witnessed by

 

Witnessed

 

 

NON JURISDICTION BY THE FRAUDULENT QUEEN OF ENGLAND.

                                                  

REGINA/THE QUEEN

             Vs

We the people of the United Kingdom

 

LAWFUL ARGUMENT AGAINST JURISDICTION & SOVEREIGNTY

 

 

  1. Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’s Fraudulent Coronation.

1.) The person who purports to be the queen has never, in fact, rightfully or Lawfully been crowned as the Sovereign. This knowledge stems from the fact that the Coronation Stone / The Stone of Destiny / Bethel / Jacob’s Pillar that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg was crowned upon is a fake. The real Coronation Stone; made from Bethel porphyry, weighing more than 4cwt. (458lbs.) according to the BBC telex in the film “The Coronation Stone”, (Covenant Recordings), and Ian R. Hamilton Q.C. in three of his books: “No Stone Unturned” (pages 36, 44), “A Touch of Treason” (page 50) and “The Taking of The Stone of Destiny” (pages 27, 35); was removed from Westminster Abbey at 04:00 hrs on the 25th of December in 1950, by his group of four Scottish Nationalist students, which included and was led by Ian Robertson Hamilton himself. The other three were Alan Stuart, Gavin Vernon and Kay Matheson, as stated in his books. Further details at:  http://jahtruth.net/stone.htm .

2.) The real Coronation Stone (“National Treasure No. 1”), was taken to Scotland where, in Glasgow, it was handed over to Bertie Gray to repair it, and was later hidden by industrialist and philanthropist John Rollo in his factory, under his office-floor, according to Ian R. Hamilton’s books – “No Stone Unturned” and “The Taking of The Stone of Destiny”, and the factory-manager.

3.) A fake stone copy had previously been made in 1920 by stone-mason, Bertie Gray, for a prior plan to repatriate the Coronation Stone, and it was made of Scottish sandstone from a quarry near Scone in Perthshire, weighing 3cwt. (336lbs.). The conspirators had used it to practice with, before going to London to Westminster Abbey to remove the real Coronation Stone from the abbey. It was that fake stone copy which was placed on the High Altar Stone at Arbroath Abbey, at Midday on the 11th April of 1951, wrapped in a Scottish Saltyre (St. Andrew’s Flag – Dark blue with white diagonal cross on it) and found by the authorities, then transported to England, where it was used for the “queen’s” coronation, according to Bertie Gray’s children in a Daily Record Newspaper article.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2008/06/29/exclusive-our-dad-faked-stone-of-destiny-claim-family-of-stonemason-who-repaired-relic-78057-20624793/

4.) The stone upon which Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg was crowned weighs exactly 3cwt (336lbs.) as attested to by Historic Scotland in their official booklet titled “The Stone of Destiny”, “Symbol of Nationhood”, obtainable from Edinburgh Castle, published by Historic Scotland, (ISBN 1 900168 44 8), who have had the stone that she was crowned on in their care, in Edinburgh Castle, since it was returned to Scotland by John Major’s Conservative government in 1996.

5.) As previously stated, the genuine Coronation Stone weighs more than 4 cwt. (458lbs.), but the one that Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg was crowned on, that has been on display in Edinburgh Castle since 1996, weighs 336lbs, not 458lbs., and thus cannot be the genuine Coronation Stone.
Therefore, never having been Lawfully crowned, she has NO authority to put the defendant on trial and the judge has NO authority to try him, because the judge’s “authority” comes from her.

Further, and without prejudice to the above…

 

  1. Some of Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’s other Crimes.

 

Sample Crimes/Points of Law:-

1.) Mrs. Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg/Mountbatten; un-Lawfully residing in Buckingham Palace, London; also known by the criminal aliases Windsor and QE2, was knowingly and willfully, with malice-aforethought, fraudulently crowned on a fake Coronation Stone / Lia Fail / Stone of Destiny / Bethel / Jacob’s Pillar on June 2nd in 1953, and has been fraudulently masquerading as the rightful British Sovereign/Crown for the last 58 years, which the Defendant can prove beyond doubt. It is Mrs. Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg who should be arrested and charged; for her innumerable acts of high-treason against God and Christ, Whose church she falsely claims to head and in defiance of Whom she had herself fraudulently crowned, and Whom she has continued to rule in defiance of, and in opposition to, ever since; not the Claimant.

2.) Allowing people to legislate in defiance of God’s Law (Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32) that she swore and affirmed, in writing, to maintain to the utmost of her power, and, in many cases, actually reversing what The Law states into being the very opposite of it.  She has fraudulently imprisoned and punished people for enforcing The Law themselves as God commands them to do, and thus un-Lawfully prevented or deterred others from doing so.  She has given Royal-Assent to 3,401 Acts of Parliament (as of 24/03/2011) and thus broken The Law against legislating 3,401 times. The very first time she gave “Royal-Assent” to ANY “Act of Parliament”, or any other piece of legislation, or allowed Parliament or anyone to legislate, she broke her Coronation Oath and was thus no longer the monarch, with immediate effect, even if she had been Lawfully crowned in the first-place, which she most definitely was not.

Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add to the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the Commandments of the Lord your God which I COMMAND you.

11:1 Therefore thou shalt love the Lord thy God, and keep His charge, and His Statutes, and His Judgments, and His Commandments, always.

12:8 Ye shall not do after all the things that we do here this day, every man whatsoever is right in his own eyes.

12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

 

A Bill MUST have Royal Assent before it can become an Act of Parliament (law).

http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/passage-bill/lords/lrds-royal-assent/

3.) Allowing the forming of political parties and demon-crazy (democracy) to divide, weaken, conquer and ruin the people (Deuteronomy 5:32, 17:20; Matthew 12:25).

Deuteronomy 5:32 Ye shall observe to do therefore as the Lord your God hath commanded you: ye shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left.

17:20 That his (the Sovereign’s) heart be NOT lifted up ABOVE his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the Commandment, [to] the right hand, or [to] the left…

Matthew 12:25 And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

4.) Removal of the death-penalty that is prescribed as the deterrent for capital crimes in The Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power; e.g. Sodomy (Deuteronomy 23:17; Leviticus 20:13); Paedophilia; Rape; Murder; Adultery; etc., thus encouraging these crimes, that are now legion.

Deuteronomy 23:17 There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.

Leviticus 20:13 If a man lie also with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Etc., etc., etc.

5.) Actually encouraging and promoting sodomy, by legalizing it, then further enacting un-Lawful anti-discrimination legislation, promoting it in schools, and giving knighthoods to high-profile sodomites in the music, film and fashion industries, instead of having them Lawfully executed as a deterrent to others.

Music – Elton John

Film – Ian McKellen of Stonewall; John Gielgud

Fashion – Norman Hartnell knighted 1977 and Hardy Amies knighted 1989.

6.) Enriching herself in defiance of God’s Law that she swore to uphold, at the expense of her subjects, driving them into debt-slavery (Egypt), poverty and homelessness (Deuteronomy 17:14-20).  Including the collecting of graven-images and expensive jewelery (her famous art and Fabergé collections, etc.)

Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me;

17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, WHOM THE LORD THY GOD SHALL CHOOSE (see Psalm 2): [one] from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.
17:16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt (slavery under man-made laws), to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the Lord hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way.
17:17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.
17:18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this Law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites:
17:19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, to keep all the words of this Law and these Statutes, to DO them:
17:20 That his heart be NOT lifted up ABOVE his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the Commandment, to the right hand, or to the left…

7.) Legalizing, facilitating and engaging in usury/interest, that has caused the ruin, bankruptcy and debt-slavery of the entire nation. http://jahtruth.net/greeneco.htm

Deuteronomy 23:19 Thou shalt not lend upon usury/interest to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury:

8.) Ignoring the “Year of Release,” where all debts are forgiven/cancelled every seven years, and the “Year of Jubilee” every fifty years, where all property is redistributed back to its owner and the wealth shared out, so that there will be no poor amongst the people.

Deuteronomy 15:1 At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release.
15:2 And this is the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth ought unto his neighbor shall release it; he shall not exact it of his neighbor, or of his brother; because it is called the Lord’s release.
15:4 Save when (to the end that) there be no poor among you; …

Leviticus 25:10 And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim Liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a Jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.

9.) Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg has also broken God’s Law by allowing the EU, which is not the British people’s racial brother, but is a stranger, to rule over you / us, in contravention of Deuteronomy 17:15.

Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that [are] about me;
17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set [him] king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose: [one] from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest NOT set a stranger over thee, which [is] not thy brother.

Deuteronomy 7:2 And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, [and] utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them:
7:3 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.
7:4 For they will turn away thy son from following Me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.
7:5 But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.
7:6 For thou [art] an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto Himself, above all people that [are] upon the face of the earth.
7:7 The Lord did not set His love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye [were] the fewest of all people:
7:8 But because the Lord loved you, and because He would keep the Oath which He had sworn unto your fathers, hath the Lord brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.
7:9 Know therefore that the Lord thy God, He [is] God, the faithful God, which keepeth Covenant and mercy with them that love Him and keep His Commandments to a thousand generations;
7:10 And repayeth them that hate (or disobey) Him to their face, to destroy them: He will not be slack to him that hateth (or disobeyeth) Him, He will repay him to his face.
7:11 Thou shalt therefore KEEP the Commandments, and the Statutes, and the Judgments, which I command thee this day, to DO them.

7:12 Wherefore it shall come to pass, if ye hearken to these Judgments, and keep, and do them, that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee The Covenant and the mercy which He sware unto thy fathers:
7:13 And He will love thee, and bless thee, and multiply thee: He will also bless the fruit of thy womb, and the fruit of thy land, thy corn, and thy wine, and thine oil, the increase of thy kine, and the flocks of thy sheep, in the land which He sware unto thy fathers to give thee.
7:14 Thou shalt be blessed above all people: there shall not be male or female barren among you, or among your cattle.
7:15 And the Lord will take away from thee all sickness, and will put none of the evil diseases of Egypt, which thou knowest, upon thee; but will lay them upon all [them] that hate thee.
7:16 And thou shalt consume all the people which the Lord thy God shall deliver thee; thine eye shall have no pity upon them: neither shalt thou serve their gods; for that [will be] a snare unto thee.
7:17 If thou shalt say in thine heart, These nations [are] more than I; how can I dispossess them?
7:18 Thou shalt not be afraid of them: [but] shalt well remember what the Lord thy God did unto Pharaoh, and unto all Egypt (and pharaoh ruled the whole known world at that time);
7:19 The great temptations which thine eyes saw, and the signs, and the wonders, and the mighty hand, and the stretched out arm, whereby the Lord thy God brought thee out: so shall the Lord thy God do unto all the people of whom thou art afraid.
7:20 Moreover the Lord thy God will send the hornet among them, until they that are left, and hide themselves from thee, be destroyed.
7:21 Thou shalt not be affrighted at them: for the Lord thy God [is] among you, a mighty God and terrible.
7:22 And the Lord thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little: thou mayest not consume them at once, lest the beasts of the field increase upon thee.
7:23 But the Lord thy God shall deliver them unto thee, and shall destroy them with a mighty destruction, until they be destroyed.
7:24 And He shall deliver their kings into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven: there shall no man be able to stand before thee, until thou have destroyed them.
7:25 The graven images of their gods shall ye burn with fire: thou shalt not desire the silver or gold [that is] on them, nor take [it] unto thee, lest thou be snared therein: for it [is] an abomination to the Lord thy God.
7:26 Neither shalt thou bring an abomination into thine house, lest thou be a cursed thing like it: [but] thou shalt utterly detest it, and thou shalt utterly abhor it; for it [is] a cursed thing.
8:1 All the Commandments which I command thee this day shall ye observe to do, that ye may live, and multiply, and go in and possess the land which the Lord sware unto your fathers.
8:2 And thou shalt remember all the way which the Lord thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, tohumble thee, [and] to test thee, to know what [was] in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep His Commandments (Law), or not.

God warned His people, YOU, the British-Israel people ( http://jahtruth.net/britca.htm ), in the Revelation/Apocalypse to John, to come out of the Mother of Harlots’, abominable (Rev. 17:5) Babylonian (http://jahtruth.net/robab.htm ) Market System:-

Revelation/Apocalypse 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, COME OUT of her, MY people, that ye take not part in her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues (punishment).

10.) She has allowed Witchcraft and condoned it – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1284449/100-UK-servicemen-class-pagans-MoD-reveals.html – and Satanism – http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3948329.stm – in her/the realm and in her/the armed forces.

Exodus 22:18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.

Deuteronomy 18:9 When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations.
18:10 There shall not be found among you [any one] that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, [or] that useth divination, [or] an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a WITCH,
18:11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a WIZARD, or a necromancer (medium).
18:12 For all that do these things [are] an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.
18:13 Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God (Matt. 5:48).

Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven IS perfect.

Deuteronomy 32:15 But the Beloved waxed fat, and rebelled: thou art waxen fat, thou art grown thick, thou art covered [with fatness]; then he forsook God [which] made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation.
32:16 They provoked Him to jealousy with strange [gods], with abominations provoked they Him to anger.
32:17 They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new [gods that] came newly up, whom your fathers feared not.

Revelation/Apocalypse 21:7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my (adopted) son.
21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and SORCERERS, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with Fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

She has given an O.B.E. to Joanne “Jo” Rowling (J. K. Rowling), who promotes witchcraft, thus herself condoning the promotion of witchcraft, and the poisoning of the minds of the nation and its children.

The other and major part of witchcraft/sorcery, that she has also allowed, and probably actually invested in, is the chemical and pharmaceutical industry that is slowly poisoning the nation through chemical-fertilizers, pesticides, chemtrails, vaccines, etc., and other pharmaceutical products/medicines/poisons (witches’ brews / potions) in order to maximize their profits, because they do not make any money from healthy people. That is why there are more sick people every year and a correspondingly higher NHS budget, rather than less sick people and a correspondingly shrinking NHS budget. The NHS, doctors and pharmacists are therefore obviously harming the population, not healing it.  http://www.rense.com/general34/quotes.htm http://jahtruth.net/heal.htm

Note well that it states in Revelation/Apocalypse 21:8 “ALL LIARS shall have their part in the lake which burneth with Fire and Brimstone . . .” and the word Parliament means “Speaking Lies” from the French words Parler which means to speak, and mentir which means to tell lies. Also the word Politics, poly meaning many; tics are blood-sucking parasites; thus politics means many blood-sucking parasites.

11.) Each and every single one of the above crimes carries the death-penalty, with public execution; under The Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power; for not doing so, along with all those who likewise reject The Law of God — Deuteronomy 17:8-13, 27:26; Malachi chapter 4.

Deuteronomy 17:8 If there arise a matter too hard for thee in to the judge that shall be in those days, and enquire; and they shall show thee The Sentence of Judgment:
17:10 And thou shalt do according to The Sentence, which they of that place which the Lord shall choose shall show thee; and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee:
17:11 According to The Sentence of The Law which they shall teach thee, and according to the Judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do: thou shalt not decline to do The Sentence which they shall show thee, and turn not away from it to the right hand, nor to the left.
17:12 And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thus thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.
17:13 And all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously (in thinking they are a law unto themselves).

27:26 Cursed be he (like Elizabeth) that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to DO them.

Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy The Law, or the Prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil (in the Greek Original – pleroo = to fully preach it).
5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from The Law, tillALL (the Prophecies) be fulfilled.
5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least Commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the Kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of heaven.
5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes (lawyers) and Pharisees (politicians), ye shall in no case enter into the Kingdom of heaven.

James 2:10 He who breaks the least of these Commandments and teaches others to do so is guilty of all.

The renowned English jurist Sir William Blackstone famously stated, “No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.”

 All of The Law references quoted are copied from the Sovereign’s Bible upon which Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’s Coronation Oath was sworn, containing God’s Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power. It is a special large print and specially bound edition of the king James Authorised Version (1611) of the Holy Bible, that she placed her right hand upon, swore the Coronation Oath upon and then kissed, before she signed the Coronation Oath.

12.) Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg is therefore not only massively in breach of contract, but also massively in breach of The Law, and thus is not only NOT the Lawful Sovereign, never has been, and thus has NO jurisdiction to prosecute me, but is also a criminal, guilty of capital crimes, that carry the death-penalty, according to The Law she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power. That Perfect Royal Law of Liberty was given by God to the British-Israel peoples to protect the British-Israel peoples from exploitation, oppression, poverty and harm, and which God has warned the British-Israel peoples to return to, with dire consequences for failure to do so. Her obscene wealth and that of her relatives, cronies and accomplices must be seized and shared out amongst the poor and homeless.

Malachi 4:1 For, behold, the Day cometh, that shall burn like an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the Lord of hosts, that it shall leave of them neither root nor branch (nothing).
4:2 But unto you that fear My name shall the Sun of Righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall.
4:3 And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in The Day that I shall do [this], saith the Lord of hosts.
4:4 Remember ye (and return to) The Law of Moses My servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for allIsrael, [with] the Statutes and Judgements.
4:5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the Prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful Day of the Lord:
4:6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse (see verse 1).

13.) The person who purports to be queen was, in fact, as proven above, never rightfully nor Lawfully the Sovereign/Crown. Therefore the Crown/Prosecution/Regina has NO authority to put the defendant/claimant on trial and the judge has NO authority to try him, because the judge’s authority comes from her.

14.) In addition, without prejudice to the above, based on God’s Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power  the “queen” is in breach of contract. She has amongst other things accumulated a large amount of personal wealth and done many other things that are expressly forbidden, some of which are listed above, and so she has breached her contract with God and the British-Israel people. Therefore, even if, which is not admitted, the “queen” was genuinely crowned, the breach of contract disqualifies her from sitting and renders null and void proceedings instituted in her name.

It is therefore of the utmost importance that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg and the Sovereign’s Bible, that is kept in Lambeth Palace*, be present in court for my challenge to her jurisdiction and sovereignty to be heard, and for me to face my false-accuser, examine her and have her arrested.

 

 

Signed:

 

Date:

                      Witnessed by:

 

TO:
HMRC
DMB 422
BX5 5AB

 

 

From:

************

DATE OF NOTICE BEING SERVED: ************

 

Sent by recorded post.

 

 

 NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING OF MISPRISION                          

                                                    OF TREASON.

—————————–

Dear HMRC,

Please read the following ‘Notice’ thoroughly and carefully. It is a NOTICE, a LAWFUL DOCUMENT and EVIDENCE.It informs you. It means what it says. The information herein is of the UTMOST URGENCY and requires yourIMMEDIATE and URGENT ATTENTION.

Please be aware that failure to act on this ‘LAWFUL’ NOTICE in accordance with section 1. of the1795 treason Act, which being the current law of  this realm, contravenes the lawful duty of every/any English sovereign man/woman within or without the realm of the English Isle’s and Commonwealth and is an OFFENCE under the ‘misprision of treason Act 1795,’ (Sec, 1);

Whereby; it is an offence at common law for any person(s) who knows that treason is being planned or committed, not to report the same as soon as he/she can to a justice of the peace. Also please be aware that the penalty for committing ‘misprision of treason’ in this day is life imprisonment, and that my sole intention of informing you of this fact in law is one of duty and not malice, menace, frivolity, vexation nor ill will.

Whereas you have made UNLAWFUL DEMANDS on myself/legal person, and/or you have advised me to comply with unlawful statutes by threat of enforcement and, that you are acting for a ‘corporation’ who has no jurisdiction over my sovereign being whatsoever and, that the ‘crown corporation’ is committing high treason against the sovereign peoples of the England and Commonwealth at this time and, that I cannot lawfully nor morally support financially, or in any other way, a treasonous regime of governance. Indeed our constitutional law FORBIDS ME TO DO SO ! Therefore…

It is to my understanding that you must now by the common law of this realm, with the evidence herein supplied, CEASE AND DESIST in all actions pertaining to the will of your peers in light of the evidence herein entrusted, which should be reported to a justice of the peace as soon as is reasonable to do so, and/or once the evidence herein has been verified to be a true statement of facts. Failure to do so would be an Act of ‘misprision of treason at common law’.

Therefore where it is to my understanding and evidenced herein that:
1. A long range deception strategy to create a single Federal European state with
the erosion of each nation’s sovereignty, currency and the powers to determine it’s
own laws and affairs, was finalised by the Geo-political centre of the third Reich in
Berlin 1942. This was done with the effect that should the Nazis lose the war ,
militarily, they could continue their plans for a European dictatorship economically,
through corporatism, and political subversion.

Their future shape of Europe is detailed in the seminars entitled ‘Europaische
wirtschaftsgemeinschaft ‘ ( public document worldcat OCLC number 31002821 ).
Translated into English as ‘European Economic Community’ which has been herein
presented as evidence.
The chapter headings of this Nazi document were replicated almost verbatim in
the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

2. Since the end of the war, divers treasonous persons, groups and movements with
this ideology, have conspired to build on this agenda which has become known as
the European Union.

3. The involvement of the United Kingdom in this agenda began in 1948 with the
formation of the European movement. This was a state funded Anglo-French pro-
federal European lobbying body posing as a non-Governmental grass roots pressure
group. A link outlining the detailed origins of this movement has been provided herein.

4.The said movement is still publicly active today lobbying for total European
integration and a European constitution.

5.The first move towards a federal Europe did not involve Britain directly, it was
the signing of the Treaty of Rome in 1957 by Germany, France, Italy, Belgium
Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

6. Meticulous research has uncovered a wealth of official, archived documents
from the period 1970-72 which shows the deceit perpetrated by the ruling elite at
the time and these documents have been released after the thirty year rule.

7. The common law applies to all sovereign living breathing men and women and
dictates that we are all born free to do what we choose for ourselves provided we
do not cause harm, injury or loss to another’s life, liberty or property or their rights
to life, liberty or property.
8. England, within the United Kingdom of Great Britain is a common law
jurisdiction and British parliament has no lawful authority ever to breach, surrender,
land, or transfer, even temporarily, sovereignty except when conquered in war.

9. No one ( neither monarch,nor prime minister, nor any prelate, politician, judge
or public servant ) is above the common law of Great Britain that forms the British
constitution (Magna Carta 1215, The Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/89, the
Coronation Oath Act 1689 and the Act’s of Union succession and settlement
1701-07).

10. The Declaration of rights 1688 is an unrebutted claim of right by the people
and therefore beyond the reach of parliament and still stands to this day. That
declaration includes the clause no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or
potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence
or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. This is mirrored in the
Bill of Rights 1689 which still stands as legislation.

11. Treason in statute law was redefined by the Treason Act 1795 for the principal
forms to include;
a) compassing the death or serious injury of the sovereign or his (or her) spouse or
eldest son;
b) levying war against the sovereign in his (or her realm), which includes , any
insurrection against the authority of the sovereign or of the Government that goes
beyond riot or violent disorder;
c) giving aid or comfort to the sovereign’s enemies in wartime.

12. Treason at common law is the offence of attempting to overthrow the
Government of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying
the state into the hands of a foreign power.

13. Sedition at common law means overt conduct such as speech and organisation,
that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the
established order. Sedition includes the subversion of a constitution and
incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.

14. The evidence presented in the ‘shoe horned into the EU ‘ files shows that the
Heath Government of 1972 was well aware that an essential loss of British
sovereignty would occur within thirty years with the passing of the European
Communities Bill and knew it would, in all likelihood, be rejected if brought to
the people, which of course it was not. This in itself is an Act of Sedition at
common law.

15. The passage of the European Communities Act in 1972, establishing the
principle that European law would always prevail over British law in the event
of a clash, thereby overthrowing the supremacy of the British parliament, was
a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Heath Administration.

16. The signing of the single European Act in 1986 reducing Britain’s
independent decision making powers further by extending majority voting in
certain areas of policy making, was a criminal Act of Treason at common
law by the Thatcher Administration.

17. The signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, based on the original EEC Berlin
document 1942, surrendering sovereign powers of the Queen in parliament to an
unelected body in Europe was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by
the Major Administration.

18. The signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 increased the European Union’s
powers for action at community level. This included further European Integration
in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened
Europol. The signing of this Treaty was a further Act of Treason at common law
by the Blair Administration.

19. With the full knowledge of this Treason and to escape prosecution, the Blair
Government repealed the Treason legislation in section 36 of the ‘crime and
disorder Act’ of 1998, abolishing the death penalty. This including the repealing
of the Treason Act 1795. However, the crime of Treason at common law still
stands as common law has primacy. A link outlining these changes to the
statute has been provided herein.

20. The signing of the Nice Treaty in 2001 and the EU constitution in 2004 were
further Acts of Treason at common law by the Blair Administration.

21. In an attempt to further protect themselves against criminal prosecution the
Blair Government removed the word ‘sovereignty’ from the oath of office of
constables in the ‘police Reform Act 2002 (section,83), and also modified the
legislation to enable non British nationals to become officers (section.82).
These are Acts of both Sedition and Treason at common law. A link to evidence
these these changes to the statute’s has been presented herein.

22. The signing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 surrendered further control of policy
including that related to immigration and borders. This was a further crime of
Treason at common law by the Brown Administration.

23. The Treasury department of the European Community has never allowed an
independent audit by professional accountants of their books in the last 14 years.
One year of non-publication is a criminal offence.
In fact, it’s financial accounts have been disapproved by the EU’s own court of
auditors for the past 14 years running.

This crime has already been reported to the UK serious fraud office by former
MP Ashley Mote. They are in possession of the evidence and have confirmed to
him that the remittance of British taxpayer’s funds into the hands of this criminal
enterprise is, of course, a criminal offence.

24. A signed letter written to former constable of Thames valley police, Albert
Burgess, from Leolin Prince Q C on the subject of the Heath Treason evidence
states that the case he ( Burgess ) puts forward is ‘arguable’ and does ‘merit
serious consideration and investigation’. To the best of my knowledge the letter
is authentic and a link to this evidence has been herein provided.

25. The six EU Treatise since 1972 are unlawful and should be struck completely
from the statute books.

 

  1. Two (2) computer discs herein provided called ‘ shoehorned into the E.U.’ Have the complete documented evidence of the sedition and treason that has been collected as evidence from the public records office. The said disc’s require YOUR IMMEDIATE AND PROFESSIONAL ATTENTION.
    The evidence submitted herein is to my understanding precise and factual and is in no way whatsoever intended to deceive, mislead, cause mischief or as an act of frivolity, vexation or ill will. Whereas the entire document is required to be responded to in its entirety within 28 days of receipt of this lawful compilation of Notices, please respond as to your lawful standing in light of this evidence presented. Our constitutional law demands that we ALL take up lawful rebellion and to continue to harass those that refuse (as to the terms and conditions laid down under Article 61 Magna Carta 1215), which was Invoked by the barons’ committee in 2001 and, which still stands to this day as the lawful position of the English Isle’s and commonwealth.

I now AFFIRM that all of the information is correct and true to the best of my knowledge and that I am of lawful age and competent to serve this ‘Notice of misprision of treason’.

I hereby affix my own name to all of the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservations to all my natural unalienable human Rights and habeas Corpus, and to my specific common law Right not to be bound by any contract nor obligation which I have not knowingly, willingly, voluntarily and without misrepresentation, duress or coercion entered into, and that any hearing with regard to this matter(s) is to be heard under the jurisdiction of the common law of the land in open forum, as this matter is of course, in the public interest and, that this is in accordance with my common law rights.

 

 

Signed___________________________                  Dated.

 

 

Witnessed by____________________________

 

 

Without Malice, vexation, frivolity or ill will with all my natural unalienable rights intact, and on full commercial liability and penalty of perjury.

 

 

Evidence enclosed; Flash disk ‘ Shoe horned into the EU.’ Exhibit A.

 

 

Maxim’s in law:- “Any Act done by me against my will is not my Act.”

 

                           ” Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all a                        

                              sworn officer of the law.”

       

                         “ The contract makes the law.”  —–      Source: Bouvier’s dictionary of law.

 

  DAVID CAMERON COMMITS

                   TREASON.

 

COUNT 1: ACT OF WAR

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE:

The UK Prime Minister and his consort In collusion with corporate, military, financial, monarchy and the Vatican committed acts of war engineering the global climate change agenda to use as a vehicle to instigate global weather warfare on the population of the planet, creating man-made extreme weather events (weapons of mass destruction) to destabilise nations to create national states of emergency, to offer military support and aid, to carry out planned false flag terrorist attacks, to then instigate martial law.

COUNT 2: GENOCIDE

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE:

The UK Prime Minister and his consort in collusion with corporate, military, monarchy and the Vatican committed and continues to commit genocide by way of extreme weather events causing flash flooding, engineered typhoons, hurricanes, tornados, polar vortex, and drought causing loss of life to innocent children, women and men on a global scale. Historical weather events such as the New Orleans hurricane Sandy and all other historical extreme weather events must also be considered based on the evidence presented in this case.

COUNT 3: TERRORISM

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE:

The UK Prime Minister and his consort in collusion with corporate, military, monarchy and the Vatican committed and continues to commit terrorist acts on the population of the planet in the form of weather warfare.

COUNT 4: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE:

The UK Prime Minister and his consort in collusion with corporate, military, monarchy and the Vatican committed and continues to commit Crimes against humanity by way of extreme weather events causing flash flooding, engineered typhoons, hurricanes, tornados, polar vortex, and drought causing loss of life to innocent children, women and men on a global scale.

COUNT 5: FRAUD

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE:

The UK Prime Minister and his consort in collusion with corporate, military, monarchy and the Vatican committed and continues to commit fraud falsifying and propagating a climate change agenda as a vehicle to collect taxes.

 

COUNT 6: MISFEASANCE, MALFEASANCE & MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE:

The UK Prime Minister and his consort committed and continues to commit misconduct in public office in knowing and supporting global terrorism and acts of war under the guise of climate change.
TO:

HMRC

DMB 422

BX5 5AB

 

 

From:

***************

 

 

DATE OF NOTICE BEING SERVED: **************

 

Sent by recorded post.

 

NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST HARASSMENT.

——————————

  NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO AGENT, NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE.

 

Dear HMRC,

THIS IS A NOTICE a lawful document. It informs you. It means what it says. Any reply to this lawful Notice must be done on oath or attestation and on your full commercial liability and penalty of perjury.

Whereas I have served un-rebutted Notices on  HMRC stating that I do not consent to their unlawful jurisdiction or the making of UNLAWFUL DEMANDS against myself/legal person and/or interested third party agent thereof, and whereas you are continuing to harass my legal person/agent by sending unannounced tax collectors to the business address, whilst no proof of Jurisdiction has been forthcoming, and that this was demanded within my previously served lawful notices and, that I am a sovereign being standing in lawful rebellion and, that I have ‘lawful excuse’ not to comply to this treasonous regime of governance, nor to any other unlawful authority legislating under a foreign jurisdiction. I therefore DEMAND that YOU MUST CEASE AND DESIST HARASSMENT IMMEDIATELY.

Furthermore, If I am forced under duress to pay a fine and/or be incarcerated TAKE NOTICE that this will be an Act of unlawful enforcement of legislation and/or enforced coercion demanding that I commit a criminal offence by paying into the coffers of a treasonous corrupt regime, and/or be incarcerated for being no more than a “loyal subject of the realm,”of which I can prove unquestionably that I am.

Whilst being in full knowledge of, and with evidence that, Treason has and is still being committed to this very day, and that I have entered into lawful rebellion, therefore it is my duty as a “loyal subject of this realm” not to comply with this present system of unlawful governance and, it is my duty to distress and distrain the monarch and also to harass and repel the will of all/any public servants that are not supporting the barons committee at this time, until such times as they do.

Any demands that are made by HMRC made on myself/legal person, will be challenged in a properly convened de-jure of 12 impartial subjects under the common law of the land as to my common law rights and, habeas corpus and, any hearing(s) must be conducted in open forum as to my constitutional common law rights. Any hearing with regard to the matter of Treason must surely be heard in public forum as it is obviously in the public interest to do so.

In light of the evidence presented herein I DEMAND that HMRC CEASE AND DESIST in harassing me further without lawful cause to do so, Any further harassment from HMRC, or any of their representatives, will result in a schedule of fees for any breach of my rights by ‘unlawful demand’ that causes me to suffer a tort incl; letters, telephone calls, visits by police or Bailiff’s or any other third party agent representative of the office of the crown and/or acting on behalf of unlawful legislation enforced by      Magistrates Court.

I stand under my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury as the chief administrator and executor for the Legal person and. as the beneficiary of the trust in any hearings forced or otherwise with regard to the crown/magistrates court, and any subsequent administration thereof. No hearing may be heard in private or in chambers, ALL forced hearings or otherwise, shall be heard in public forum under common law jurisdiction as to my established common law rights.

NEW FEE SCHEDULE (Non negotiable instrument).

1.) For ANY unlawful legislative demands made or enforced against my legal person and/or agent thereof, I demand a fee of £1,000,000.00p (One Million) GB pounds (or gold/silver equivalent), PER INCIDENT (To be paid within 30 days on receipt of the demand for payment).

IN ADDITION to the above demanded fee a further fee schedule exists as follows;

2.) For ANY ORDER unlawfully demanded against my legal person and/or agent thereof, no matter how trivial it may appear to be, by ANY officer, Judge, Magistrate or any other person/body presuming such an administrative role, I demand an additional £1,000,000.00p (One Million) GB pounds (or gold/silver equivalent), PER ORDER GIVEN;

3.) For ANY unlawful transgressions against my legal person and/or agent thereof, that causes either to suffer physical harm, pain or emotional stress/anxiety or resulting in either to suffer any undesired physical affect whatsoever, I demand an additional fee of £500.000.00p (Five hundred thousand) GB pounds (or gold/silver equivalent), PER INCIDENT;

4.) For ANY unlawful detention, incarceration or loss of property/freedoms incurred by enforced unlawful legislation against my legal person and/or agent thereof, I demand an additional fee of £250,000.00p (Two hundred and fifty thousand) GB pounds, (or gold/silver equivalent) PER INCIDENT, with an additional £25,000.00p(Twenty five thousand) GB pounds per hour or part thereof, for any time lost due to unlawfully enforced legislation.

5.) For ANY breach of the peace incurred against my legal person and/or agent thereof, in addition to any of the above, I demand a fee of £100,000.00p (one hundred thousand) GB pounds (or gold/silver equivalent), PER INCIDENT;

6.) For ANY unlawful letter/notice telephone call, email or any other unwarranted unlawful harassment directed at my legal fiction and/or agent thereof, I demand an additional fee of  £25,000.00p (Twenty five thousand) GB pounds (or gold/silver equivalent) PER INCINDENT, with a further penalty of a £25,000.00p (Twenty five thousand) GB pounds (or gold/silver equivalent) PER HOUR or part thereof for any time lost by these nuisances;

7.) For ANY correspondence made by my legal person and/or agent thereof in response to any of the above shall be charged at £5,000.00p (Five thousand) GB pounds per letter/notice, and/or at a rate of £25,000.00p (Twenty five thousand) GB pounds per hour or part thereof;

8.) For ANY unlawful cash amount demanded from my legal person and/or agent thereof, shall be multiplied by a factor of 10 and returned to the sender for immediate payment within Five (5) working days.

Without malice, vexation, frivolity or ill will and with all my natural unalienable, indefeasible, unalienable common law rights intact, and on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury.

 

Signed:

 

Witnessed by:            Date.

Maxim;(Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856): An established principle or proposition. A principle of law universally admitted, as being just and consonant with reason. 

Maxim; The law of God and the law of the land are all one, and both favour and preserve the common good of the land.

“THREE (3) ELEMENTS OF  EVERY CRIME:Every” crime must have all three of these three following elements in which to be a crime under law. Not two of the three. Not one of the three –but all three. Failure to provide 99.9% of the time does not meet this requirement. (Father is either forced or driven out of a child’s life, father is usually poor and financially debilitated, or Father does not owe as either a crime or great dishonor has been committed against him).”

1.) Mens rea — “An element of criminal responsibility: a guilty mind; a guilty        .         or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and wilfulness.       .         United states v. Greenbaum, C.C.A.N.J., 138 F2d 437, 438. See Model Penal  .         Code Section 2,02. See also Criminal (Criminal Intent). [ Blacks Law              .         Dictionary, 6th Ed. p. 985]

  • Actus reus – “The guilty Act.” A wrongful deed which renders the actor criminally liable if combined with mens rea. The actus reus is the physical aspect of a crime, whereas the mens rea (guilty mind) involves the intent factor. [Blacks, Ed. p. 36]
  • Corpus delecti – “The body of a crime” The body (material substance) upon which a crime has been committed, e.g. the corpse of a murdered man, the charred remains of a house burned down. In a derivative sense, the objective proof or substantial fact that a crime has been committed. The “corpus delecti” of a crime is the body, foundation or substance of a crime, which ordinarily includes two elements, the act and the criminal agency of the act. States v. Edwards, 49 Ohio St. 2d 31, 358 N.E. 2D 1051, 1055. [Blacks law Dictionary, 6th 344]

Articles of the International covenant on civil and political rights;

Article 9, subsection 5, i.e.: that “ anyone who has been the victim of unlawful arrest or detention shall have an enforceable right to compensation.”

“Nemo admittendis est inhabilitare seipsum.” – “ No one is allowed to incapacitate himself.” Therefore, a man cannot be an artificial ‘person,’ which would incapacitate him and deny him his right, as a freeman, to trial by jury.

Judge or magistrate – “You are at level three in the ‘pecking order’ I am at level two. I have jurisdiction over you – not you over me. I have the inalienable Right to trial by jury – and, if I don’t want to avail myself of a jury, I’ll give my consent to that effect. Until then do not exceed your jurisdiction,”

If the common law no longer exists then it stands to reason that it must be TREASON !

Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice

Quoted passages from the section dealing with “OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE – E. CONTEMPT AT COMMON LAW”. These quotations are not taken out of context, but quoted with additional highlighting (underlining):

Sir John Donaldson M.R.: “Mens rea in the law of contempt was something of a minefield. The reason was that it was wholly the creature of the common law and had developed on a case by case basis”.

In Dean v. Dean [1987] F.L.R. 517, C.A. (Civ. Div.), the court said that: “Contempt of court, whether civil or criminal, is a common law misdemeanour and it had long been recognised that proceedings for contempt were criminal or quasi-criminal in nature and that the case against the alleged contemnor must be proved to the standard of criminal proof namely, beyond reasonable doubt

Until Att-Gen v. Newspaper Publishing plc and others [1988] Ch. 333, C.A. (Civ. Div.), there was widespread acceptance of the classification of contempts as being either civil or criminal. Civil contempt consisted of disobedience to an order of the court in circumstances where the disobedience is principally a matter that affects the parties to the case. Sir John Donaldson (again) later pointed out that the classification was not really relevant, since contempts have to be proved to criminal standards anyway.

Buckley J. held that “No contempt had been committed because the case was to be tried by a Judge sitting alone, who would be unaffected”

At common law, a contempt of court is an act or omission calculated to interfere with the due administration of justice: Att-Gen v. Butterworth Islands, re a special reference from [1893] A.C 138. There is no impediment to a court making a finding of contempt, when it is appropriate to do so, not against the Crown directly but against a government department or a minister of the Crown in his official capacity: M. v. Home Office and another [1993] 3 All E.R. 537, H.L

Lord Diplock in Att-Gen v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1974], ante, outlines the various ways which the due administration of justice might be prejudiced: “The due administration of justice requires first that all citizens should have unhindered access to the constitutionally established courts of criminal or civil jurisdiction for the determination of disputes as their legal rights and liabilities; secondly, that they should be able to rely upon obtaining in the courts the arbitrament of a tribunal which is free from bias against any party and whose decision will be based upon those facts only that have been proved in evidence adduced before it in accordance with the procedure adopted in courts of law; and thirdly that, once the dispute has been submitted to a court of law, they should be able to rely upon there being no usurpation by any other person of the function of the courtto decide according to law. Conduct which is calculated to prejudice any of these requirements or to undermine public confidence that they will be observed is contempt of court”

Thus, airily waving away the legitimate concerns of a Litigant-in-Person, whose Common Sense has been used to make reasonable statements and ask reasonable questions and requests, must be deemed to be – at the very leastprima facie – Contempt of Court, by virtue of undermining public confidence.

Conspicuous – by absence – from anywhere in the discussions of Contempt of Court, are the following, which form the corollaries to what has been said:

  1. That justice is served by counting costs – the implication being that justice will not be served by counting costs and that counting costs is, therefore, a Contempt of Court.
  2. That justice is served by using expedient means – the implication being that justice will not be served by using expedient means and that utilising expedient means is, therefore, a Contempt of Court.
  3. That justice is served by denying Indefeasible Human Rights – the implication being that justice is not served by denying Indefeasible Human Rights and that any denial of Indefeasible Human Rights is, therefore, a Contempt of Court.
  4. That justice is served by means of rules designed with any or all of the above in mind – the implication being that designing or implementing or following or observing such rules is not serving justice and is, therefore, a Contempt of Court.

It seems hard to argue anything else, when set against (even, for example) what Lord Diplock said in 1974.

 

(Document submitted evidence here).

 

Share This Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


Lost Password

Register

Skip to toolbar